|
Study: U.S.
Leads In Mental Illness, Lags in Treatment
By Rick Weiss
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, June 7, 2005; A03
© 2005
The Washington Post Company
One-quarter
of all Americans met the criteria for having a mental illness within
the past year, and fully a quarter of those had a "serious"
disorder that significantly disrupted their ability to function
day to day, according to the largest and most detailed survey of
the nation's mental health, published yesterday.
Although parallel
studies in 27 other countries are not yet complete, the new numbers
suggest that the United States is poised to rank No. 1 globally
for mental illness, researchers said.
"We lead
the world in a lot of good things, but we're also leaders in this
one particular domain that we'd rather not be," said Ronald
Kessler, the Harvard professor of health care policy who led the
effort, called the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.
The exhaustive
government-sponsored effort, based on in-depth interviews with more
than 9,000 randomly selected Americans, finds that the prevalence
of U.S. mental illness has remained roughly flat in the past decade
-- a possible glimmer of hope given that previous decades had suggested
the rates were gradually rising.
But the rest
of the news from the survey -- which did not include some of the
most serious disorders, such as schizophrenia, for which patients
are often institutionalized -- is mostly discouraging.
Less than half
of those in need get treated. Those who seek treatment typically
do so after a decade or more of delays, during which time they are
likely to develop additional problems. And the treatment they receive
is usually inadequate.
Younger sufferers
are especially overlooked, the survey found, even though mental
illness is very much a disease of youth. Half of those who will
ever be diagnosed with a mental disorder show signs of the disease
by age 14, and three-quarters by age 24. But few get help.
Many factors
contribute to these failings, the reports conclude, including inattention
to early warning signs, inadequate health insurance and the lingering
stigma that surrounds mental illness.
"The system
has to get its act together to get its quality of care up,"
Kessler said.
Thomas Insel
-- chief of the National Institute of Mental Health, which funded
the $20 million study -- said the nation needs to recognize that
mental illness is a chronic condition that requires expert medical
attention just as heart disease, Alzheimer's and diabetes do.
He said he was
disappointed to learn from the survey that despite the availability
of effective treatments for many mental illnesses, including depression
and anxiety, about a third of people in need rely solely on nonprofessional
sources such as Internet support groups and spiritual advisers.
"You wouldn't
rely on your priest for treatment if you had breast cancer,"
Insel said. "Why would you go to your priest for a major depressive
disorder? These are real medical and brain disorders, and they need
to be treated that way."
Mental health
surveys have been conducted nationwide since the 1940s, but they
offered only crude measures until 10 years ago, when the first National
Comorbidity Study was performed. That highly structured survey asked
questions specific enough to provide an accurate diagnosis for a
wide range of mental disorders.
The study's
10-year follow-up, described in four reports in the June issue of
the Archives of General Psychiatry, goes further by measuring, for
the first time, the severity and persistence of people's mental
illness and the quality of their treatment.
The survey,
conducted by the University of Michigan, included 9,282 households
selected at random in 34 states. Nearly 300 trained interviewers
traveled about 8 million miles over a year and a half. They knocked
on doors at all hours of the day and night to ensure they would
not systematically miss alcohol abusers who spend their days at
bars, people with depression who can go weeks hardly able to pull
themselves out of bed and people with social phobia who only rarely
answer the doorbell.
The interview
notes were uploaded to a central repository for analysis by psychiatrists
and other health professionals at Harvard Medical School.
The survey focused
on four major categories of mental illness: anxiety disorders (such
as panic and post-traumatic stress disorders); mood disorders (such
as major depression and bipolar disease); impulse control disorders
(such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder); and substance
abuse.
Almost half
of Americans meet the criteria for such an illness at some point
in their lives, the survey found. Most cases are mild and probably
do not require treatment. But every year about 6 percent of adults
are so seriously affected that they cannot perform even routine
activities for periods averaging three months. Because schizophrenia,
autism, and some other severe and relatively common disorders were
not included, actual prevalence rates are somewhat higher, Kessler
said.
Comorbidity
-- the simultaneous occurrence of two or more illnesses -- is common,
the survey found. Nearly half of people with one mental disorder
met the criteria for two or more. That's a problem because mental
health services are usually geared toward one illness or another.
"Our findings
highlight the importance of integrating treatments, of treating
the people instead of the disorder," said NIMH investigator
Kathleen Ries Merikangas.
The fraction
of the population treated for mental illness over a 12-month period
has grown to 17 percent from 13 percent a decade ago -- a sign,
perhaps, that advertisements for antidepressants and other drugs
are working, and the stigma of being treated is decreasing.
But most of
those affected receive either no help or are being treated by nonmedical
providers or nonspecialists, whose care typically fails to meet
minimal standards of adequacy, Kessler said.
It is not clear
why Americans have such high rates of mental illness, but cultural
factors clearly play a role. Immigrants quickly increase their risk
of mental health problems, especially if they do not live in native
ethnic communities. Minorities also tend to have lower levels of
mental health problems despite lower economic status, suggesting
that the social support they provide each other is protective.
|